Hon. dakuku adol peterside

Retrieved 23 October Vanguard News. Stakeholders say; he was appointed to come and make his own money, it is a setback for the maritime industry". ShippingPosition Online. Solomon Elusoji. Vanguard Newspaper. Time Nigeria Magazine. Toggle the table of contents. Dakuku Peterside. The law is well settled that the issue of jurisdiction is so fundamental to adjudication that it can be raised at any stage of the proceedings and even for the first time on appeal to this Court.

See: Usman Dan Fodio University v. Daurodu 15 Pt. The issues are therefore competent before this Court. By Section 3 of the Constitution, the hon dakuku adol peterside of the Governorship Election Tribunal shall be as set out in the sixth Schedule to the Constitution. Paragraph 2 1 of the 6th schedule provides that the Governorship Election Tribunal shall consist of a chairman and two other members, while Section 4 of the Constitution provides that the quorum of an Election Tribunal established under the section shall be the chairman and one other member.

It has been argued on behalf of the 1st and 2nd respondent's that the delivery of the ruling by the Tribunal headed by Ambursa, J. That one of the Tribunal members who participated in the hearing of the petition, Hon. Justice Leha, delivered the ruling. It is also contended that the provision of Paragraph 25 1 of the 1st Schedule to the Electoral Act was not applicable in the circumstances of this case, as the hearing had not commenced.

Provided that it shall not be necessary for all the Justices who heard a cause or matter to be present when judgment is to be delivered and the opinion of a Justice may be pronounced or read by any other Justice, whether or not he was present at the hearing. It is evident from this constitutional provision that the intention of the framers of the Constitution is that where a panel of Justices hears a cause or matter, each of them must express and deliver his opinion writing.

Such written opinion may however be delivered by any other Justice of the Court on behalf of a Justice who participated in the hearing but is unavoidable absent. The opinion delivered must be the opinion of the Justices who participated in the hearing. Even though the provision of Section 1 and 2 refers specifically to Justices of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal, it is my view that the principle is applicable to any Court or Tribunal that sits in a panel of two or more members.

There is no doubt that Ambursa, J could not have formed an opinion on the submissions of learned counsel, which he did not hear. In the eyes of the law only Leha, J and Taiwo, J delivered the ruling. The signature of Ambursa, J on the ruling was invalid. In the case of Sokoto State Govt v. Kamdex Nig. The judgment so delivered was declared a nullity.

The remaining two members of the Tribunal who participated in the hearing of the application and delivered opinion therein could not form a quorum in the absence of the chairman who participated in the hearing. The Tribunal was not properly constituted for the delivery of the ruling and therefore lacked the competence to do so. See Madukolu v.

It is a nullity. It follows that the appellant's right to fair hearing was breached as there is no resolution of the issues submitted for determination in the said application. Issues 3 and 4 concern the competence of the issuance and service of the Election Petition outside the jurisdiction of the Tribunal in purported breach of Sections 96, 97, 98 of the Sheriffs and Civil Process Act Cap.

Ukala, SAN, for the appellant argued that Paragraphs 6, 7, 8, and 10 of the 1st Schedule to the Electoral Act are concerned with the issuance and service of an election petition within the State or Territorial jurisdiction of the Tribunal.

Hon. dakuku adol peterside

It is further contended that where the originating process is to be served outside the State or Territorial jurisdiction of the Tribunal, the Sheriffs and Civil Process Act, is applicable. Learned senior counsel argued that there is nothing in the Electoral Act that excludes recourse to Sheriffs and Civil Process Act and that in law what is not expressly prohibited is permissible.

He submitted further that paragraph 54 of the 1st Schedule incorporates and adopts the provisions of the Federal High Court Rules and makes them applicable to election petition cases subject only to the provisions of the Electoral Act itself. On this premise, he posited that the provision of the Federal High Court Rules Civil Procedureincluding Order 6 Rules 13, 14, 15, and 16 are applicable in this case.

He submitted that Paragraph 54 of the 1st Schedule permits the application of the Federal High Court Rules "with such modification as may be necessary to render them applicable having regard to the provisions of the Act, and therefore the alleged inconsistency as contended by the Lower Court between the 30 days stipulated by Section 99 of the Sheriffs and Civil Process Act for entering appearance and the 21 days limited under paragraph 10 2 of the 1st Schedule, is misconceived.

He distinguished the authority of Oloruntoba-Ojo v. Abdulraheem SCN relied on by. Report Report a problem. Table of contents Search. Navigate document. Delivering the Leading Judgment : This appeal was heard on 27th January, after hearing submissions from learned counsel. Policy Expert. Political Strategist. Meet Dakuku. As featured on. Peterside is a respected columnist who has mastered the art of balancing objective criticism of government policies with constructive solutions.

As a multipurpose consultant, Dr. Peterside has advised five state governments and numerous firms on public policy and investment relations. His contributions have been invaluable in shaping government policies and driving investment in critical sectors. This has not only enhanced economic growth but also contributed to the development of human capital in Nigeria.

Armed with a leadership style that is characterised by his ability to inspire and motivate those around him, his commitment to excellence has earned him the admiration of his peers and the hon dakuku adol peterside of most Nigerians. Peterside has remained steadfast, even in the face of adversity, demonstrating a rare breed of loyalty and dedication.

We acknowledge the impact of his leadership, the inspiration he has provided to a generation of Nigerians in dire need of guidance and direction, as well as the transformative change he has brought to institutions. Dakuku Peterside!